Large Numbers

&&&

The dynamic evidence page

It's here: the law of evidence on Spindle Law. See also this post and this post.

Law and Philosophy

There were, I think, a lot of things wrong with German Idealism. But, in my dotage, I occasionally miss the grand aspirations and vision of philosophers such as Immanuel Kant and G.W.F. Hegel (and, long before that, Plato and Aristotle). Modern legal "theorists" -- some of them, in any event -- should have the courage to talk once again about ontology as well as epistemology. They could take their inspiration (and guts) from the AI-Folk, many of whom have not hesitated to talk about "ontologies."

&&&

The dynamic evidence page

It's here: the law of evidence on Spindle Law. See also this post and this post.

Recent Article on the Baffling Case of Edward Jackson, Medical Doctor and Rapist

See The Case of Rapist Dr. Edward F. Jackson, which I discussed earlier here.

Sometimes there are too few degrees of separation from horrors.

&&&

The dynamic evidence page

It's here: the law of evidence on Spindle Law. See also this post and this post.

Panel Discussion on Statistical Inference in Legal Proceedings

The current chair of the AALS Evidence Section -- Ed Cheng -- recently announced the following event:

EVIDENCE SECTION PANEL, Saturday, January 8, 2011, 10:30am-12:15pm, The Future of Statistics and the Law.

The panel this year is something of an homage to the fortieth anniversary of the Finkelstein-Fairley-Tribe debates in the Harvard Law Review over the use of statistical evidence in legal proceedings. Given the recent popularity of quantitative methods in the legal academy and the growth of computationally intensive methods in areas like on-line retailing, I thought it would be a good time to revisit the question of the place of statistics in the law.

The panel, comprised of Erica Beecher-Monas (Wayne State), George Fisher (Stanford), Jay Koehler (Northwestern), and Mike Pardo (Alabama), will look at the future of statistical evidence from a variety of angles. In addition to a historical look at the old chestnut, People v. Collins, the panel will examine the promise of statistics in generating more rigorous inferences, the philosophical objections to this promise, and how statistics have played out in real courtroom battles.

This looks like a very interesting program.

&&&

The dynamic evidence page

It's here: the law of evidence on Spindle Law. See also this post and this post.