Sunday, March 07, 2004

News Flash: Six Judicial Opinions See Some Merit in Souter's Thesis of Non-Linear Reasoning about Evidence!

Six judicial opinions found that the phrase "linear scheme of reasoning" was not so insensible that it should not be quoted. See

  • United States v. Becht, 267 F.3d 767 (8th Cir. 2001)
  • United States v. Hill, 249 F.3d 707 (8th Cir, 2001)
  • United States v. Pabon-Cruz, 255 F. Supp. 2d 200 (S.DN.Y., 2003)
  • Blue Cross & Blue Shield of N.J., Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc., 138 F. Supp. 2d 357 (E.D.NY., 2001)
  • Briggs v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17335 (D. Md., 1997)
  • State v. Alexander, 214 Wis. 2d 628, 571 N.W.2d 662 (1997)

  • Post a Comment