I have to restrain myself. I want to post comments about every provocative posting on this new cybersite. But I really can't afford to spend even more time on an activity that the producers of LawCulture say is not scholarship. Woe is I!
But question: If blogs are not worthy legal scholarship, what motivates the authors of LawCulture to blog? Are they after fortune? Fame? A judgeship? Power and influence? Catharsis? Sainthood? Community? Liberty? Some combination of these things (and other things?)?