Three New Papers on Quantification of the Reasonable Doubt Standard

Peter Tillers & Jonathan Gottfried, Case Comment United States v. Copeland, 369 F.Supp.2d 275 (E.D.N.Y. 2005): A Collateral Attack on the Legal Maxim that Proof beyond a Reasonable Doubt Is Unquantifiable?, 5 Law, Probability and Risk 135 (2006).

James Franklin, Case comment—United States v. Copeland, 369 F. Supp. 2d 275 (E.D.N.Y. 2005): quantification of the ‘proof beyond reasonable doubt’ standard, 5 Law, Probability and Risk 159 (2006).

Judge Jack Weinstein & Ian Dewsbury, Comment on the meaning of ‘proof beyond a reasonable doubt’, 5 Law, Probability and Risk 167 (2006).

Links to abstracts of these papers are available at Current Contents