1. Time and Fact (a/k/a Evidential) InvestigationA system to facilitate or support fact investigation, evidential argument, and evidence assessment should be sensitive to these various perspectives on evidence, to these various ways of organizing evidence and thinking about evidence. I pledge that future iterations of MarshalPlan will (eventually) incorporate (all of) these various ways of marshaling evidence and thinking about evidence.A. The history of an investigation (including investigative paths not taken as well as those taken)2. Time and Events at Issue
B. Guesses or predictions about the discovery of evidence through future actionA. The (possible) sequence of events at issue in time3. Time and Sources of Evidence
B. The causal nexus between events at issue in timeA. The (possible) sequence of events pertaining to states of sources of evidence (such as "human sources," human beings)4. Time and Deliberation
B. The causes of changes over time in the states of sources of evidenceA. The order of receipt of evidence by (or submission of evidence to) the fact finder or decision maker5. Time and Mind (a/k/a Judgment)
B. The sequence of deliberation by the trier of fact or decision makerA. Changes in the trier's or decision maker's recollections, sentiments, and similar matters that affect evidential assessment
B. Temporal causes of such changes in the mind or judgment of the trier or decision maker
Monday, January 28, 2008
Time and Evidence
Time is involved in a number of important and separate ways in fact investigation, evidential argument, and evidence assessment in legal settings (and probably in many other kinds of settings):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment