The Supreme Court granted certiorari in an eyewitness identification case, Perry v. New Hampshire, No. 10-8974. The 
petitioner's brief states the issue thus:
QUESTION PRESENTED
Do the due process safeguards against the State’s use of unreliable eyewitness identification evidence at trial apply to all identifications which arise from impermissibly suggestive circumstances and which are very substantially likely to lead to misidentiļ¬cation, or only to those identiļ¬cations which are also the product of “improper state action”?
&&&
The American Psychological Association submitted an amicus brief.
&&&
The dynamic evidence page
Evidence marshaling software 
MarshalPlan
It's here: the  
law of evidence on Spindle Law. See also 
this post and 
this post.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment