The Supreme Court granted certiorari in an eyewitness identification case, Perry v. New Hampshire, No. 10-8974. The
petitioner's brief states the issue thus:
QUESTION PRESENTED
Do the due process safeguards against the State’s use of unreliable eyewitness identification evidence at trial apply to all identifications which arise from impermissibly suggestive circumstances and which are very substantially likely to lead to misidentiļ¬cation, or only to those identiļ¬cations which are also the product of “improper state action”?
&&&
The American Psychological Association submitted an amicus brief.
&&&
The dynamic evidence page
Evidence marshaling software
MarshalPlan
It's here: the
law of evidence on Spindle Law. See also
this post and
this post.
No comments:
Post a Comment