Proportionality and Quantitative Justice

• SPECIAL ISSUE: Proportionality and Quantitative Justice

Volume 10 Issue 3 September 2011

Articles

• • Rainhard Bengez, 
  • Scott Brewer, 
  • Giovanni Sartor, 
  • and Vern Walker

  Proportionality and quantitative justice. An introduction to the special issue

  Law, Probability and Risk (2011) 10(3): 161-165 doi:10.1093/lpr/mgr014
  • Full Text (PDF)
   
  • Permissions
• Select this article
  • Peter Tillers

  Trial by mathematics—reconsidered

  Law, Probability and Risk (2011) 10(3): 167-173 doi:10.1093/lpr/mgr011
  • Abstract
   
  • Full Text (PDF)
   
  • Permissions
• Select this article
  • Scott Brewer

  Logocratic method and the analysis of arguments in evidence

  Law, Probability and Risk (2011) 10(3): 175-202 doi:10.1093/lpr/mgr013
  • Abstract
   
  • Full Text (PDF)
   
  • Permissions
• Select this article
  • Douglas Walton

  Teleological argumentation to and from motives

  Law, Probability and Risk (2011) 10(3): 203-223 doi:10.1093/lpr/mgr012
  • Abstract
   
  • Full Text (PDF)
   
  • Permissions
• Select this article
  • Joseph L. Gastwirth, 
  • Efstathia Bura, 
  • and Weiwen Miao

  Some important statistical issues courts should consider in their assessment of statistical analyses submitted in class certification motions: implications for Dukes v. Wal-mart

  Law, Probability and Risk (2011) 10(3): 225-263 doi:10.1093/lpr/mgr009
  • Abstract
   
  • Full Text (PDF)
   
  • Permissions
• Select this article
  • Daniela Tiscornia, 
  • Tommaso Agnoloni, 
  • and Maria-Teresa Sagri

  Balancing rights and values in the Italian Courts: a statistical and conceptual analysis

  Law, Probability and Risk (2011) 10(3): 265-275 doi:10.1093/lpr/mgr010
  • Abstract
   
  • Full Text (PDF)
   
  • Permissions

  &&&
The dynamic evidence page

Evidence marshaling software MarshalPlan

It's here: the law of evidence on Spindle Law. See also this post and this post.