Monday, July 22, 2013

Was Trayvon Martin an "Innocent Child"?

This conservative commentator - Shelby Steele - thinks not:

"Why did the civil-rights leadership use its greatly depleted moral authority to support Trayvon Martin? This young man was, after all, no Rosa Parks—a figure of indisputable human dignity set upon by the rank evil of white supremacy. Trayvon threw the first punch and then continued pummeling the much smaller Zimmerman. Yes, Trayvon was a kid, but he was also something of a menace. The larger tragedy is that his death will come to very little. There was no important principle or coherent protest implied in that first nose-breaking punch. It was just dumb bravado, a tough-guy punch."

&&&
The dynamic evidence page

Evidence marshaling software MarshalPlan


Post a Comment