Showing posts with label shaken baby syndrome. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shaken baby syndrome. Show all posts

Monday, February 18, 2013

Shaken Baby Syndrome


The following is a 2011 article with lots of unsystematic to-and-fro about the forensic and medical validity or invalidity of the shaken baby syndrome:



&&&
The dynamic evidence page

Evidence marshaling software MarshalPlan


Saturday, April 07, 2012

Shaken Baby Syndrome

Carol J. Williams, Brown commutes sentence of woman convicted of killing grandson, LATimes (April 7, 2012).



In the courts:
Cavazos v. Smith, 132 S.Ct. 2 (2011) (per curiam; Ginsburg, Breyer & Sotomayor, dissenting), reversing Smith v.Mitchell, 437 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 2006).
 

It would better if syndrome evidence of every kind were banished from the courtrooms of our land.


See the earlier post:

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Shaken Baby Syndrome

For an excellent -- but noncommittal -- review of the growing controversy over the "shaken baby syndrome," see Mark Hansen, Unsettling Science: Experts Are Still Debating Whether Shaken Baby Syndrome Exists ABA Journal (Dec. 1, 2011).



&&&


The dynamic evidence page
Evidence marshaling software MarshalPlan
It's here: the law of evidence on Spindle Law.

See also this post and this post.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Shaken Baby Syndrome

For an excellent -- but noncommittal -- review of the growing controversy over the "shaken baby syndrome," see Mark Hansen, Unsettling Science: Experts Are Still Debating Whether Shaken Baby Syndrome Exists ABA Journal (Dec. 1, 2011).
 
&&&

The dynamic evidence page
Evidence marshaling software MarshalPlan
It's here: the law of evidence on Spindle Law. See also this post and this post.