Showing posts with label standing and personhood for trees and rivers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label standing and personhood for trees and rivers. Show all posts

Saturday, October 20, 2012

If not trees, then rivers?

Four decades ago Professor Christoper Stone asked what he called an "unthinkable" question: "Should trees have standing? See Christopher Stone,  Should Trees Have Standing? - Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects? 45 Southern California Law Review 450 (1972). I don't know if trees have standing in New Zealand. But it seems that one river now does. Tree Hugger [sic], New Zealand Grants a River the Rights of Personhood care2 make a difference [sic] (September 8, 2012). See also Kate Shuttleworth, Agreement entitles Whanganui River to legal identity New Zealand Herald (August 30, 2012).


It must be nice to live in a country that can afford to take such questions seriously.
&&&
The dynamic evidence page

Evidence marshaling software MarshalPlan