Sunday, November 18, 2007

Are Sensations Irreducible or Are They Complex?

Marvin Minsky, Interior Grounding, Reflection, and Self-Consciousness (originally published in Brain, Mind and Society, Proceedings of an International Conference on Brain, Mind and Society, Graduate School of Information Sciences, Brain, Mind and Society, Tohoku University, Japan, September 2005):

[S]ome people ... think that the qualities of such sensations [such as the sensation of a color such as "red"] are so basic and irreducible that they will always remain inexplicable.

However, I prefer to take the opposite view—that what we call sensations are complex reflective activities. They sometimes involve extensive cascades in which some parts of the brain are affected by signals whose origins we cannot detect—and therefore, we find them hard to explain. So, I see no exceptional mystery here: we simply don’t yet know enough about what is actually happening in our brains. But when you think enough about anything, then you see this is also the case with everything.

Minsky is one smart cookie.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

(blush)Thanks for your compliment!(/unblush)

In fact, you are the very first person from whom I've heard any comment on that paper—which I think has a lot of important new ideas about perception, consciousness, and subjectivity.

Thanks again,
Marvin Minsky

Unknown said...

I am genuinely shocked and honored to be the recipient of a comment by Marvin Minsky. (Not only is he smart and a founding father of AI, he is also gracious.)

&&&

Differences about details are, of course, important. But Minsky's longstanding view that a large variety of cognitive mechanisms, functions, or processes are important or essential for intelligent behavior appeals to me because, viewed at a very coarse level, I hold a similar view about explicit methods of evidence marshaling and explicit methods of reasoning from and about evidence in legal settings; I believe that a variety of marshaling methods and types of argument should be used. (Even on this point, however, my insight is parasitical and derivative: it was David Schum who gently nudged me in this direction.)